Monday, October 27, 2008
Discussion Question 6
I think that saving nature is something important that we need to be concerned with but we also need to take into account the restoration and conservation of what is left. There are many thousands of species of plants and animals that have already been lost and the biodiversity of the planet is decreasing and we need to be concerned with saving and restoring the diversity. The planet cannot survive on monocultures of species because if something happened to them (disease, natural disaster, etc) then there would be nothing to start over with.
The most thrilling experience I've had with the natural world was my trip to Costa Rica in 2006. We did a lot of eco-tourism on the trip and one of the most memorable places was Tortuguero. Tortuguero is unique in that the only way to reach much of it is by boat; there are no roads. It still has dense forests (as shown in the picture above) and lots of wildlife, including white faced monkeys, caiman, and a variety of birds and lizards. One morning many of us were even woken up by the noise of the howler monkeys. We got to go out into the forest on boats and hiking. Though the trip was great, I wasn't able to do much exploring on my own because I was with a group from my high school and we had a schedule to keep to. Still, it was one of my most memorable experiences and I hope to return to Tortuguero when I am back in Costa Rica next semester.
I don't understand how anyone could argue that nature shouldn't be saved. We as humans are part of the natural world. We depend upon the Earth's natural services to sustain us. We use resources that are taken out of nature and would be unable to survive without them. We derive pleasure from nature through simply going out into it and feeling like part of it. When I was younger, I would often wander around the woods near my house or go hiking at the state park so I could get away for a while. Although technology can replicate some things, I truly do not believe that technology can advance so far as to remove our need for the natural world. The desire to save it isn't entirely altruistic as some seem to think. While those of us that want to save nature do think that it is important to maintain and protect the environment and think we shouldn't drive other species to extinction, we all want to maintain nature for ourselves and our children and future generations. As was brought up in our last class, the Earth will survive once humans are gone, but we cannot survive without the Earth. And even if it were possible, would we want to?
Sunday, October 26, 2008
I do think saving nature is a major concern. I remember driving down to east Texas and seeing the trees get bigger and bigger the closer we got to Louisiana. It’s my favorite thing about the south, thinking that those same trees could have been there since La Salle explored the Mississippi, or when the confederates were fighting the civil war. I used to imagine exploring those woods before anyone had ever been there. Mapping them out when they were virgin forests. I would never want my children to grow up in a place that didn’t have trees or lakes that were safe to explore.
Monday, October 6, 2008
eating like we care
The first thing I always take into account when shopping for food at the local grocery is definitely the tastiness. Sadly, my choices on food for the most part are selfish. I buy 1) what tastes yummy and 2) what's on sale. I do make trips down to the farmers' market occasionally, when I'm craving turnip greens and can't find them in Giant. I avoid grocery shopping as much as possible though, so when I do go I buy everything at once. And when I'm finally starving and sick of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches I'll make the stubborn trip to the grocery store. I do make a point of buying fair trade, as Elizabeth does, when I can. But for me too, it's more of a human rights issue than an environmental one.
Of all the things I've consumed in the last few days, the one that probably had the most environmental impact was the biryani my mom made me while she was here visiting. The spices were shipped from somewhere in South Asia, my mom brought the basmati rice with her from Texas (because they don't sell the right brand up here) which I'm sure was produced somewhere else before even that, and who knows where the rest of the ingredients came from. Chicken, potatoes, tomatoes, onions…I don't think many of them were probably grown locally.
Food Food Food
The foods that have the most impact on the environment that I have eaten recently would probably be the apples that come from Eastern Washington and have to be shipped across the country and the Coca-Cola. I am sure that the process for making coke is resource intensive including the use of the aluminium or plastic to make the bottle or can as well as the actual coke itself.
Saturday, October 4, 2008
Thoughtful Eating
Of the foods I ate over those two days, the most environmentally impactful dish was probably a olive/artichoke/cheese dish. (I don't know what it's called; it was part of the only TDR meal I've had this year). While I don't know all the ingredients of the dish, but both artichokes and olives are grown in the Mediterranean and therefore were likely shipped thousands of miles. The cheese also would have come from dairy farms in which cows require a lot of grain and release methane gasses.